🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the Britain, and it appears it’s time for a rethink. Throughout its history, an observance that started out as a commemorative event of history, culture and the connections between global Black communities, has developed a corporate feel, expanding to include gatherings where Black people are paid to address white audiences about hidden biases and active solidarity. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s created a surge in the enterprise of demonstrating racial awareness. However, that period has concluded. The tide has reached its height, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what promoting consciousness is for.

The Origins of Black History Observance

First commemorated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of celebration and reflection in the February's second week. Black History Month developed from this movement and was publicly established in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the United States and Canada in the second month, but also in autumn in the Britain, the Federal Republic of Germany, Ireland and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The month has transformed since those days, focusing less on the narratives of transatlantic enslavement and civil rights battles, and greater focus on prominent Black figures in politics, culture, and activism, and widely honoring the input Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in schools where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with talks and cultural events. But the method the observance is celebrated is a reflection of the political moment. How it progresses is a good lesson in how co-option leads to erosion: the transformation of Black History Month has stymied the point of it, which is to confront structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Hardly anything shows how critical it is to reconsider Black History Month as much as the current time in which it falls this year. In the Britain, a revitalized conservative movement in the form of the Reform political group is top in opinion ratings. In the warmer months we witnessed the biggest extreme right demonstration in British history. Kemi Badenoch, the African descendant in charge of the Tory party, is a strong critic of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a position where a member of parliament feels emboldened to state that the absence of Caucasian individuals in parts of a city is a cause for alarm. Simultaneously, ultra-nationalist movements are expanding in the European continent as a complete entity.

In the US, a colossal assault against DEI and affirmative action has been brought, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the supreme judicial bodies of the nation. A effort to remove Black history and narrative from the archives is in progress. One of the political figure's early administrative commands targeted the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the prestigious establishment, claiming they of a coordinated and broad attempt to rewrite our Nation’s history” by representing the nation “as inherently racist”.

Against this backdrop, the celebration symbolises how minimally it can be influential if it is restricted to either dutiful corporate observances, or depoliticized celebrations of historical achievements, rather than addressing the conditions of the contemporary world. It also shows how its limited duration means that it is separated from the wider consistent effort that is required. A university professor, a educator at University of Greenwich, put it best when she raised concerns about the fleeting superficial actions of the celebration. “The issue with embracing a superficial method”, she stated, “is that it often means that Black History Month becomes a transient display rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Determining how to alter, change and broaden efforts for fair treatment and appreciation in such moments of dejection and worry is a treacherous thing. There is a temptation to just do away with things like Black History Month entirely, believing they are simply not fit for purpose, or are vestiges of an era that has not worked.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and tradition of activism for racial justice – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, DEI programs, and certainly, even commercial engagements – represent an infrastructure that a significant effort has been dedicated to. It is there not only to deteriorate as the situation evolves (and in fact, regresses), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month appear as? Firstly, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is spread out through the year (as certain organizations are already beginning to do), parts of its content (particularly around prominent figures of color) incorporated into academic syllabi. It would also be a period that does not evade political issues, and allows opportunity for individuals, particularly young people, to express their concerns and stories. What use is simple recognition of the history when it ignores the contemporary truth of far-right rallies in the public spaces? Institutions who observe it should not be pacified with the neutral terminology of implicit prejudice and sensitivity to subtle slights, but confronted with the risks that face all if anti-racism is not taken seriously. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made contemporary, pressing, and adaptive. It could be that an complete renaming is in order – Black History is Now Month.